Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/4th Battalion, 319th Airborne Field Artillery Regiment
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nominator proposes a MERGE rather than deletion, and no other users have argued for deletion. See Help:Merging for instructions on proposing a merger. (non-admin closure) --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 17:18, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- 4th Battalion, 319th Airborne Field Artillery Regiment (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Note: See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3rd Battalion, 319th Airborne Field Artillery Regiment, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2nd Battalion, 18th Field Artillery Regiment for precedent. Article may not be notable enough to be alone. Propose merging all related articles into a new article, 319th Airborne Field Artillery Regiment. elektrikSHOOS 23:51, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep as AfD isn't a place for a merge discussion. Armbrust Talk Contribs 08:51, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:29, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep - A merge does not require an AFD, and in fact, a merge precludes deletion as the article histories are needed for attribution. -- Whpq (talk) 15:31, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.